Publisher's Synopsis
This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1874 edition. Excerpt: ... LONGHAND. In my enumeration of the qualifications for a reporter, I have mentioned a clear, legible style of longhand writing. I cannot say that this is essential, for the majority of reporters write very badly. But that it is highly desirable there can hardly be a question. The urgent demands often made for copy in a newspaper office are not favourable to the development of the best style of penmanship, and some excuse should be made for the reporter whose characters get a little straggling towards one or two o'clock in the morning. If, however, he has cultivated the habit of writing legibly, he will rarely, whatever pressure may be put upon him, find himself betrayed into a scrawling style. He may dash along at the top of his speed, he may use numberless abbreviations, he may fail to form his letters with exactness; but with all his omissions and variations of outline an unerring instinct will enable him to preserve a degree of legibility in his writing, of which no compositor will complain. In the London newspaper offices it is not usual for the reporters to read the "proofs " of their reports, and even in the country the opportunity of correction is not always afforded: hence, if the handwriting is not tolerably legible, occasional mistakes, and sometimes serious ones, are inevitable. I remember the case of a clever reporter who lost a valuable engagement solely in consequence of the difficulty, or rather the impossibility, of deciphering his "copy." Eepeated remonstrances were addressed to him; but the habit had become inveterate, and he paid the penalty of his carelessness. In rapid shorthand writing the help of the context is constantly needed; but I hold that longhand should be almost independent of such aid. If the young...
