Publisher's Synopsis
This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1891 edition. Excerpt: ... cannot say the exact words. I then said I was not satisfied with the case, and that I would see Dr. Humphreys at once, which I did." If. Mrs. Maybrick had been poisoning her husband with arsenic, when so treated by this brother-in-law on Wednesday night, the 8th of May, she would not, as I think my readers will agree, have been likely to have left all this arsenic about unconcealed in that dressing-room, until the 12th of May, when it was said to have been found by these unfriendly people, and Mr. Justice Stephen need have found no difficulty, and my readers will find mone, in suggesting that there may be explanations, which " do not exclude doubt upon the subject of her guilt" in the circumstance of the discovery of all this arsenic found in that house, at the time when, and in the circumstances under which it was found. However, Mr. Justice Stephen did not suggest any explanations; what he said are the words I have quoted, and I will not comment upon them because I need not. There was no concealed meaning in them, and a Liverpool Common Jury were quite able to understand what he wanted them to understand. the search in the corpse BearAin The first search in the corpse was made at the post mortem on Corpse. Monday, the 13th of April, by Dr. Humphreys, Dr. Carter, and Dr. Barron.-The following is Dr. Humphreys' evidence at the Inquest on Dr. Humphrey, the 6th of June, concerning the post-mortem examination: --Q. On Monday, the 13th of May, did you make a post-mortem examination on the body of the deceased? A. Yes. Q. And were you assisted in your examination by Drs. Carter and Barron? A. Yes. Post-mortem Q. Now, will you describe what you found there in your post mortem? nppearances. A. Yes. The stiffness of death was pretty well marked....
