Publisher's Synopsis
This rather slim book seeks to find a satisfactory answer to one of Indian history's great controversies: the circumstances under which H?m? died. H?m?, who had proclaimed himself king after Humayun's death, was defeated by the Mughal army at Second Battle of Panipat in 1556, which ensured Akbar's ascension to the Mughal throne. Some historians have discarded the popular belief that Akbar's guardian, Bairam Khan, killed H?m?. The H?m? incident reveals Akbar, as he was in his younger days, when his liberal, wise, and philosophic outlook had not yet developed.
The author of this book draws upon several references and historians in this work for searching and establishing the true facts of H?m?'s death. Indologist and historian Vincent Smith, based on the writings of Ahmad Yadgar and Pelsart van den Broecke, was the first to reject the accepted version that Akbar had magnanimously refused to execute the almost-dead H?m?, and that in all probability, he listened to Bairam Khan and struck off his head.
The book systematically goes through various historical works that support or reject either of the views on H?m?'s death. Sukumar Ray quotes various authorities, and these are followed by the English translations. He refers to writers Abu-l Fazl, Firishta, Badauni, Yadgar, Faizi Sirhindi, and Van den Broecke, to name a few, arguing the validity of each viewpoint, rejecting or accepting these based on historical evidence and in-depth corroboration before he finally arrives at the conclusion.
