Publisher's Synopsis
<p> There is a great wealth of diversity in the <b>business tort laws</b> of all fifty states and the District of Columbia. In addition to the very significant differences in the statutes of limitation, other significant differences include: </p> <ul> <li> Some states have not recognized a cause of action for negligent interference with an economic advantage. </li> <li> Negligent misrepresentation in one state is limited to claims against persons in the business of supplying information to others. </li> <li> One state recognizes a cause of action for "strict responsibility misrepresentation." </li> <li> Another state recognizes claims of "prima facie tort" for wrongs that do not fit into traditional tort categories. </li> </ul> <p> And these are only a few examples of the more significant differences. </p> <p> The new <b><i>2013 Edition</i></b> of <b><i>Business Torts: A Fifty-State Guide</i></b> helps you quickly assess the merits and pitfalls of litigation in any given jurisdiction allowing you to make the best decisions for your clients. </p> <ul> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> </ul> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p>
