Publisher's Synopsis
The book describes and analyzes the Darfur region crisis. The Darfur dilemma is a vivid example of rebellion that was triggered because of uneven governmental development and turned into multiple revolutions. It started in 2003 with rebels attacking the main city of Northern Darfur, El Fasher. The government decided that the rebellion can finished with military power of suppression. However, after sixty-seven defeats of the army, they reverted to recruiting the infamous militia known as the Janjaweed. Truly, the latter tremendously succeeded, but only in terrorizing the Darfur Greater Region's civilians. Villages and crops were burned, wells buried or poisoned and mass killings happened everywhere. However, hatred of whatever ethnic or tribal targeting inflamed the rebellion. The latter single movement hatched more and more. The Janjaweed militia were not able to contain such massive rebellions in such great region. It was apparent even for members of the military Junta in Khartoum that peaceful negotiations are inevitable. However, whatever deals or negotiations carried out failed to contain the crisis which continue to escalate for ten years. The current research adopts preliminary investigation using the empirical framework of the Game Theory in the conducted analysis. We do not claim that it is totally perfect, however, we claim that the theory is right. It is concluded that with the path the Darfur crisis going on, secession is inevitable. It is also concluded that the current regime is unable, does not want or helpless to contribute in solving the problem. Probably because of his tactics in negotiating with specific parts, bribing them with money or governmental positions. Moreover, it is suggested in this document that Khartoum regime is a causative agent of the Darfur crisis. If it continues in power, Darfur, and other regions of Sudan, e.g., Kordofan, the Blue Nile, Nuba Mountains and the Eastern region shall follow the Southern Sudan that seceded in 2011. It is also suggested that fair and holistic development policies should be followed, without ethnic or tribal preferences. That is impossible under the current regime partialities towards some ethnicities and regions.
