Publisher's Synopsis
The judicial interpretation of statutes and constitutions is the controversial focus of much contemporary legal philosophy and practice. It is crucial for the distribution of power as between legislatures and judiciaries in democratic polities. The original essays in this volume relate to the prospects of finding a workable separation of powers which utilizes the rule of positive law to curb political power without undermining the right to self-determination which is central to the democratic ideal. Written by a group of distinguished American and Australian legal and political philosophers, the essays are divided into three parts: those sharing a particular concern with the proper role of law-makersÆ intentions in legal interpretation; those applying or discussing particular approaches to interpretation: historical, comparative, hermeneutic, deconstructionist, and natural law; and those discussing originalism, individual rights, implications, and federalism in constitutional interpretation. -
